## 13.1 $$p(\boldsymbol{x})=\sum_{i=1}^{N} \alpha_{i} \cdot p\left(\boldsymbol{x} | \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}, \mathbf{\Sigma}_{i}\right)$$ [解析]: 该式即为 9.4.3 节的式(9.29),式(9.29)中的$k$个混合成分对应于此处的$N$个可能的类别 ## 13.2 $$ \begin{aligned} f(\boldsymbol{x}) &=\underset{j \in \mathcal{Y}}{\arg \max } p(y=j | \boldsymbol{x}) \\ &=\underset{j \in \mathcal{Y}}{\arg \max } \sum_{i=1}^{N} p(y=j, \Theta=i | \boldsymbol{x}) \\ &=\underset{j \in \mathcal{Y}}{\arg \max } \sum_{i=1}^{N} p(y=j | \Theta=i, \boldsymbol{x}) \cdot p(\Theta=i | \boldsymbol{x}) \end{aligned} $$ [解析]: 首先,该式的变量$\theta \in \{1,2,...,N\}$即为 9.4.3 节的式(9.30)中的 $\ z_j\in\{1,2,...k\}$ 从公式第 1 行到第 2 行是做了边际化(marginalization);具体来说第 2 行比第 1 行多了$\theta$为了消掉$\theta$对其进行求和(若是连续变量则为积分)$\sum_{i=1}^N$ [推导]:从公式第 2 行到第 3 行推导如下 $$\begin{aligned} p(y = j,\theta = i \vert x) &= \cfrac {p(y=j, \theta=i,x)} {p(x)} \\ &=\cfrac{p(y=j ,\theta=i,x)}{p(\theta=i,x)}\cdot \cfrac{p(\theta=i,x)}{p(x)} \\ &=p(y=j\vert \theta=i,x)\cdot p(\theta=i\vert x)\end{aligned}$$ [解析]: 其中$p(y=j\vert x)$表示$x$的类别$y$为第$j$个类别标记的后验概率(注意条件是已知$x$); $p(y=j,\theta=i\vert x)$表示$x$的类别$y$为第$j$个类别标记且由第$i$个高斯混合成分生成的后验概率(注意条件是已知$x$ ); $p(y=j,\theta=i,x)$表示第$i$个高斯混合成分生成的$x$其类别$y$为第$j$个类别标记的概率(注意条件是已知$\theta$和$x$,这里修改了西瓜书式(13.3)下方对$p(y=j\vert\theta=i,x)$的表述; $p(\theta=i \vert x)$表示$x$由第$i$个高斯混合成分生成的后验概率(注意条件是已知$x$); 西瓜书第 296 页第 2 行提到“假设样本由高斯混合模型生成,且每个类别对应一个高斯混合成分”,也就是说,如果已知$x$是由哪个高斯混合成分生成的,也就知道了其类别。而$p(y=j,\theta=i\vert x)$表示已知$\theta$和$x$ 的条件概率(其实已知$\theta$就足够,不需$x$的信息),因此 $$p(y=j\vert \theta=i,x)= \begin{cases} 1,&i=j \\ 0,&i\not=j \end{cases}$$ ## 13.3 $$ p(\Theta=i | \boldsymbol{x})=\frac{\alpha_{i} \cdot p\left(\boldsymbol{x} | \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}, \mathbf{\Sigma}_{i}\right)}{\sum_{i=1}^{N} \alpha_{i} \cdot p\left(\boldsymbol{x} | \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}, \mathbf{\Sigma}_{i}\right)} $$ [解析]:该式即为 9.4.3 节的式(9.30),具体推导参见有关式(9.30)的解释。 ## 13.4 $$ \begin{aligned} L L\left(D_{l} \cup D_{u}\right)=& \sum_{\left(x_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l}} \ln \left(\sum_{i=1}^{N} \alpha_{i} \cdot p\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j} | \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}, \mathbf{\Sigma}_{i}\right) \cdot p\left(y_{j} | \Theta=i, \boldsymbol{x}_{j}\right)\right) \\ &+\sum_{x_{j} \in D_{u}} \ln \left(\sum_{i=1}^{N} \alpha_{i} \cdot p\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j} | \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}, \mathbf{\Sigma}_{i}\right)\right) \end{aligned} $$ [解析]:由式(13.2)对概率$p(y=j\vert\theta =i,x)=$的分析,式中第 1 项中的$p(y_j\vert\theta =i,x_j)$ 为 $$p(y_j\vert \theta=i,x_j)= \begin{cases} 1,&y_i=i \\ 0,&y_i\not=i \end{cases}$$ 该式第 1 项针对有标记样本$(x_i,y_i) \in D_i$来说,因为有标记样本的类别是确定的,因此在计算它的对数似然时,它只可能来自$N$个高斯混合成分中的一个(西瓜书第 296 页第 2 行提到“假设样本由高斯混合模型生成,且每个类别对应一个高斯混合成分”),所以计算第 1 项计算有标记样本似然时乘以了$p(y_j\vert\theta =i,x_j)$ ; 该式第 2 项针对未标记样本$x_j\in D_u$;来说的,因为未标记样本的类别不确定,即它可能来自$N$个高斯混合成分中的任何一个,所以第 1 项使用了式(13.1)。 ## 13.5 $$ \gamma_{j i}=\frac{\alpha_{i} \cdot p\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j} | \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}, \mathbf{\Sigma}_{i}\right)}{\sum_{i=1}^{N} \alpha_{i} \cdot p\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j} | \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}, \mathbf{\Sigma}_{i}\right)} $$ [解析]:该式与式(13.3)相同,即后验概率。 可通过有标记数据对模型参数$(\alpha_i,\mu_i,\Sigma_i)$进行初始化,具体来说: $$\alpha_i = \cfrac{l_i}{|D_l|},where |D_l| = \sum_{i=1}^N l_i$$ $$\mu_i = \cfrac{1}{l_i}\sum_{(x_j,y_j) \in D_l\wedge y_i=i}x_j$$ $$ \Sigma_{i}=\frac{1}{l_{i}} \sum_{\left(x_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i}\left( x_{j}- \mu_{i}\right)\left( x_{j}-\mu_{i}\right)^{\top} $$ 其中$l_i$表示第$i$类样本的有标记样本数目,$|D_l|$为有标记样本集样本总数,$\wedge$为“逻辑与”。 ## 13.6 $$ \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}=\frac{1}{\sum_{\boldsymbol{x}_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i}+l_{i}}\left(\sum_{\boldsymbol{x}_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i} \boldsymbol{x}_{j}+\sum_{\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i} \boldsymbol{x}_{j}\right) $$ [推导]:类似于式(9.34)该式由$\cfrac{\partial LL(D_l \cup D_u) }{\partial \mu_i}=0$而得,将式(13.4)的两项分别记为: $$LL(D_l)=\sum_{(x_j,y_j \in D_l)}ln(\sum_{s=1}^{N}\alpha_s \cdot p(x_j \vert \mu_s,\Sigma_s) \cdot p(y_i|\theta = s,x_j)$$ $$LL(D_u)=\sum_{x_j \in D_u} ln(\sum_{s=1}^N \alpha_s \cdot p(x_j | \mu_s,\Sigma_s))$$ 对于式(13.4)中的第 1 项$LL(D_l)$,由于$p(y_j\vert \theta=i,x_j)$取值非1即0(详见13.2,13.4分析),因此 $$LL(D_l)=\sum_{(x_j,y_j)\in D_l} ln(\alpha_{y_j} \cdot p(x_j|\mu_{y_j}, \Sigma_{y_j}))$$ 若求$LL(D_l)$对$\mu_i$的偏导,则$LL(D_l)$求和号中只有$y_j=i$ 的项能留下来,即 $$\begin{aligned} \cfrac{\partial LL(D_l) }{\partial \mu_i} &= \sum_{(x_i,y_i)\in D_l \wedge y_j=i} \cfrac{\partial ln(\alpha_i \cdot p(x_j| \mu_i,\Sigma_i))}{\partial\mu_i}\\ &=\sum_{(x_i,y_i)\in D_l \wedge y_j=i}\cfrac{1}{p(x_j|\mu_i,\Sigma_i) }\cdot \cfrac{\partial p(x_j|\mu_i,\Sigma_i)}{\partial\mu_i}\\ &=\sum_{(x_i,y_i)\in D_l \wedge y_j=i}\cfrac{1}{p(x_j|\mu_i,\Sigma_i) }\cdot p(x_j|\mu_i,\Sigma_i) \cdot \Sigma_i^{-1}(x_j-\mu_i)\\ &=\sum_{\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i} \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1}\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right) \end{aligned}$$ 对于式(13.4)中的第 2 项$LL(D_u)$,求导结果与式(9.33)的推导过程一样 $$\cfrac{\partial LL(D_u) }{\partial \mu_i}=\sum_{x_j \in {D_u}} \cfrac{\alpha_i}{\sum_{s=1}^N \alpha_s \cdotp(x_j|\mu_s,\Sigma_s)} \cdot p(x_j|\mu_i,\Sigma_i )\cdot \Sigma_i^{-1}(x_j-\mu_i)$$ $$=\sum_{x_j \in D_u }\gamma_{ji} \cdot \Sigma_i^{-1}(x_j-\mu_i)$$ 综合两项结果,则$\cfrac{\partial LL(D_l \cup D_u) }{\partial \mu_i}$为 $$ \begin{aligned} \frac{\partial L L\left(D_{l} \cup D_{u}\right)}{\partial \mu_{i}} &=\sum_{\left(x_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{t} \wedge y_{j}=i} \Sigma_{i}^{-1}\left(x_{j}-\mu_{i}\right)+\sum_{x_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i} \cdot \Sigma_{i}^{-1}\left(x_{j}-\mu_{i}\right) \\ &=\Sigma_{i}^{-1}\left(\sum_{\left(x_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i}\left(x_{j}-\mu_{i}\right)+\sum_{x_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i} \cdot\left(x_{j}-\mu_{i}\right)\right) \\ &=\Sigma_{i}^{-1}\left(\sum_{\left(x_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i} x_{j}+\sum_{x_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i} \cdot x_{j}-\sum_{\left(x_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i} \mu_{i}-\sum_{x_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i} \cdot \mu_{i}\right) \end{aligned} $$ 令$\frac{\partial L L\left(D_{l} \cup D_{u}\right)}{\partial \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}}=0$,两边同时左乘$\Sigma_i$可将$\Sigma_i^{-1}$消掉,移项即得 $$ \sum_{x_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i} \cdot \mu_{i}+\sum_{\left(x_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{t} \wedge y_{j}=i} \mu_{i}=\sum_{x_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i} \cdot x_{j}+\sum_{\left(x_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i} x_{j} $$ 上式中, $\mu_i$ 可以作为常量提到求和号外面,而$\sum_{\left(x_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i} 1=l_{i}$,即第 类样本的有标记 样本数目,因此 $$\left(\sum_{x_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i}+\sum_{\left(x_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i} 1\right) \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}=\sum_{x_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i} \cdot \boldsymbol{x}_{j}+\sum_{\left(x_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i} \boldsymbol{x}_{j}$$ 即得式(13.6); ## 13.7 $$ \begin{aligned} \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}=& \frac{1}{\sum_{\boldsymbol{x}_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i}+l_{i}}\left(\sum_{\boldsymbol{x}_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i}\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)^{\mathrm{T}}\right.\\+& \sum_{\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i}\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)^{\mathrm{T}} ) \end{aligned} $$ [推导]:类似于13.6 由$\cfrac{\partial LL(D_l \cup D_u) }{\partial \Sigma_i}=0$得,化简过程同13.6过程类似 对于式(13.4)中的第 1 项$LL(D_l)$ ,类似于刚才式(13.6)的推导过程; $$ \begin{aligned} \frac{\partial L L\left(D_{l}\right)}{\partial \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}} &=\sum_{\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i} \frac{\partial \ln \left(\alpha_{i} \cdot p\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j} | \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}, \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}\right)\right)}{\partial \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}} \\ &=\sum_{\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i} \frac{1}{p\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j} | \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}, \mathbf{\Sigma}_{i}\right)} \cdot \frac{\partial p\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j} | \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}, \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}\right)}{\partial \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}} \\ &=\sum_{\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i} \frac{1}{p\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j} | \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}, \mathbf{\Sigma}_{i}\right)} \cdot p\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j} | \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}, \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}\right) \cdot\left(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1}\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)^{\top}-\boldsymbol{I}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2} \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1}\\ &=\sum_{\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i}\left(\mathbf{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1}\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)^{\top}-\boldsymbol{I}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2} \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1} \end{aligned} $$ 对于式(13.4)中的第 2 项$LL(D_u)$ ,求导结果与式(9.35)的推导过程一样; $$ \frac{\partial L L\left(D_{u}\right)}{\partial \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}}=\sum_{\boldsymbol{x}_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i} \cdot\left(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1}\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)^{\top}-\boldsymbol{I}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2} \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1} $$ 综合两项结果,则$\cfrac{\partial LL(D_l \cup D_u) }{\partial \Sigma_i}$为 $$ \begin{aligned} \frac{\partial L L\left(D_{l} \cup D_{u}\right)}{\partial \boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}}=& \sum_{\boldsymbol{x}_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i} \cdot\left(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1}\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)^{\top}-\boldsymbol{I}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2} \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1} \\ &+\sum_{\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i}\left(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1}\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)^{\top}-\boldsymbol{I}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2} \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1} \\=&\left(\sum_{\boldsymbol{x}_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i} \cdot\left(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1}\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)^{\top}-\boldsymbol{I}\right)\right.\\ &\left.+\sum_{\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i}\left(\boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1}\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)^{\top}-\boldsymbol{I}\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2} \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1} \end{aligned} $$ 令$\frac{\partial L L\left(D_{l} \cup D_{u}\right)}{\partial \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}}=0$,两边同时右乘$2\Sigma_i$可将 $\cfrac{1}{2}\Sigma_i^{-1}$消掉,移项即得 $$ \begin{aligned} \sum_{\boldsymbol{x}_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i} \cdot \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1}\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)^{\top}+& \sum_{\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}, y_{j} \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i\right.} \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i}^{-1}\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)^{\top} \\=& \sum_{\boldsymbol{x}_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i} \cdot \boldsymbol{I}+\sum_{\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i} \boldsymbol{I} \\ &=\left(\sum_{\boldsymbol{x}_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i}+l_{i}\right) \boldsymbol{I} \end{aligned} $$ 两边同时左乘以$\Sigma_i$,上式变为 $$ \sum_{\boldsymbol{x}_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i} \cdot\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)^{\top}+\sum_{\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}, y_{j}\right) \in D_{l} \wedge y_{j}=i}\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)\left(\boldsymbol{x}_{j}-\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i}\right)^{\top}=\left(\sum_{\boldsymbol{x}_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i}+l_{i}\right) \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{i} $$ 即得式(13.7); ## 13.8 $$ \alpha_{i}=\frac{1}{m}\left(\sum_{\boldsymbol{x}_{j} \in D_{u}} \gamma_{j i}+l_{i}\right) $$ [推导]:类似于式(9.36),写出$LL(D_l \cup D_u)$的拉格朗日形式 $$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}(D_l \cup D_u,\lambda) &= LL(D_l \cup D_u)+\lambda(\sum_{s=1}^N \alpha_s -1)\\ & =LL(D_l)+LL(D_u)+\lambda(\sum_{s=1}^N \alpha_s - 1)\\ \end{aligned}$$ 类似于式(9.37),对$\alpha_i$求偏导。对于LL(D_u),求导结果与式(9.37)的推导过程一样: $$\cfrac{\partial LL(D_u)}{\partial\alpha_i} = \sum_{x_j \in D_u} \cfrac{1}{\Sigma_{s=1}^N \alpha_s \cdot p(x_j|\mu_s,\Sigma_s)} \cdot p(x_j|\mu_i,\Sigma_i)$$ 对于$LL(D_l)$,类似于(13.6)和(13.7)的推导过程 $$\begin{aligned} \cfrac{\partial LL(D_l)}{\partial\alpha_i} &= \sum_{(x_i,y_i)\in D_l \wedge y_j=i} \cfrac{\partial ln(\alpha_i \cdot p(x_j| \mu_i,\Sigma_i))}{\partial\alpha_i}\\ &=\sum_{(x_i,y_i)\in D_l \wedge y_j=i}\cfrac{1}{ \alpha_i \cdot p(x_j|\mu_i,\Sigma_i) }\cdot \cfrac{\partial (\alpha_i \cdot p(x_j|\mu_i,\Sigma_i))}{\partial \alpha_i}\\ &=\sum_{(x_i,y_i)\in D_l \wedge y_j=i}\cfrac{1}{\alpha_i \cdot p(x_j|\mu_i,\Sigma_i) }\cdot p(x_j|\mu_i,\Sigma_i) \\ &=\cfrac{1}{\alpha_i} \cdot \sum_{(x_i,y_i)\in D_l \wedge y_j=i} 1 \\ &=\cfrac{l_i}{\alpha_i} \end{aligned}$$ 上式推导过程中,重点注意变量是$\alpha_i$ ,$p(x_j|\mu_i,\Sigma_i)$是常量;最后一行$\alpha_i$相对于求和变量为常量,因此作为公因子提到求和号外面; 为第$i$类样本的有标记样本数目。 综合两项结果,则$\cfrac{\partial LL(D_l \cup D_u) }{\partial \alpha_i}$为 $$\cfrac{\partial LL(D_l \cup D_u) }{\partial \mu_i} = \cfrac{l_i}{\alpha_i} + \sum_{x_j \in D_u} \cfrac{p(x_j|\mu_i,\Sigma_i)}{\Sigma_{s=1}^N \alpha_s \cdot p(x_j| \mu_s, \Sigma_s)}+\lambda$$ 令$\cfrac{\partial LL(D_l \cup D_u) }{\partial \alpha_i}=0$并且两边同乘以$\alpha_i$,得 $$ \alpha_i \cdot \cfrac{l_i}{\alpha_i} + \sum_{x_j \in D_u} \cfrac{\alpha_i \cdot p(x_j|\mu_i,\Sigma_i)}{\Sigma_{s=1}^N \alpha_s \cdot p(x_j| \mu_s, \Sigma_s)}+\lambda \cdot \alpha_i=0$$ 结合式(9.30)发现,求和号内即为后验概率$\gamma_{ji}$,即 $$l_i+\sum_{x_i \in D_u} \gamma_{ji}+\lambda \alpha_i = 0$$ 对所有混合成分求和,得 $$\sum_{i=1}^N l_i+\sum_{i=1}^N \sum_{x_i \in D_u} \gamma_{ji}+\sum_{i=1}^N \lambda \alpha_i = 0$$ 这里$\Sigma_{i=1}^N \alpha_i =1$ ,因此$\sum_{i=1}^N \lambda \alpha_i=\lambda\sum_{i=1}^N \alpha_i=\lambda$ 根据(9.30)中$\gamma_{ji}$表达式可知 $$\sum_{i=1}^N \gamma_{ji} = \sum_{i =1}^{N} \cfrac{\alpha_i \cdot p(x_j|\mu_i,\Sigma_i)}{\Sigma_{s=1}^N \alpha_s \cdot p(x_j| \mu_s, \Sigma_s)}= \cfrac{\sum_{i =1}^{N}\alpha_i \cdot p(x_j|\mu_i,\Sigma_i)}{\sum_{s=1}^N \alpha_s \cdot p(x_j| \mu_s, \Sigma_s)}=1$$ 再结合加法满足交换律,所以 $$\sum_{i=1}^N \sum_{x_i \in D_u} \gamma_{ji}=\sum_{x_i \in D_u} \sum_{i=1}^N \gamma_{ji} =\sum_{x_i \in D_u} 1=u$$ 以上分析过程中,$\sum_{x_j\in D_u}$ 形式与$\sum_{j=1}^u$等价,其中u为未标记样本集的样本个数; $\sum_{i=1}^Nl_i=l$其中$l$为有标记样本集的样本个数;将这些结果代入 $$\sum_{i=1}^N l_i+\sum_{i=1}^N \sum_{x_i \in D_u} \gamma_{ji}+\sum_{i=1}^N \lambda \alpha_i = 0$$ 解出$l+u+\lambda = 0$ 且$l+u =m$ 其中$m$为样本总个数,移项即得$\lambda = -m$ 最后带入整理解得 $$l_i + \Sigma_{X_j \in{D_u}} \gamma_{ji}-m \alpha_i = 0$$ 整理即得式(13.8);